Literature review guidelines

The award to Italian performance artist Dario Fo in 1997 was initially considered "rather lightweight" [63] by some critics, as he was seen primarily as a performer, and Catholic organizations saw the award to Fo as controversial as he had previously been censured by the Roman Catholic Church . [64] The Vatican newspaper L'Osservatore Romano expressed surprise at Fo's selection for the prize commenting that "Giving the prize to someone who is also the author of questionable works is beyond all imagination." [65] Salman Rushdie and Arthur Miller had been strongly favoured to receive the Prize, but the Nobel organisers were later quoted as saying that they would have been "too predictable, too popular." [66]

Privacy Statement:
Carol Hurst's Children's Literature Site does not collect and store information about individual web site visitors. If you sign-up for our email newsletter we need your email address and you may also give us your name but will not share that email address or name with any other company nor use it ourselves for anything other than newsletter mailings, ever.
In addition, Google's Double Click may serve ads on this website. In doing so, one of their ad servers will place or read a unique ad-serving cookie on your computer and will use non-personal information about your browser and your activity at this site to serve ads on this and other sites. The ad-serving cookie is a persistent cookie. Please click here for more information or to opt-out of the Double Click ad-serving cookie.

The first category in Bloom's taxonomy is remembering . For a person doing a literature review this would include tasks such as recognition, retrieval and recollection of the relevant literature. During this stage relevant books, articles, monographs , dissertations , etc. are identified and read. Bloom’s second category understanding occurs as the scholar comprehends the material they have collected and read. This step is critical because no one can write clearly about something they do not understand. Understanding may be challenging because the literature could introduce the scholar to new terminology, conceptual framework and methodology . Comprehension (particularly for new scholars) is often improved by taking careful notes. In Bloom’s third category applying the scholar is able to make connections between the literature and his or her larger research project. This is particularly true if the literature review is to be a chapter in a future empirical study. The literature review begins to inform the research question, and methodological approaches. When scholars analyze (fourth category in Bloom's taxonomy) they are able to separate material into parts and figure out how the parts fit together. Analysis of the literature allows the scholar to develop frameworks for analysis and the ability to see the big picture and know how details from the literature fit within the big picture. Analysis facilitates the development of an outline (list) . The books, articles and monographs read will be of different quality and value. When scholars use Bloom’s fifth category evaluating they are able to see the strengths and weaknesses of the theories, arguments, methodology and findings of the literature they have collected and read. [7] When scholars engage in creating the final category in Bloom's taxonomy, they bring creativity to the process of doing a literature review. In other words, they draw new and original insights from the literature. They may be able to find a fresh and original research question, identify a heretofore, unknown gap in the literature or make surprising connections. By understanding how ways of thinking connect to tasks of a literature review, a scholar is able to be self-reflective and bring metacognition to the process of reviewing the literature. [5]

Are you familiar with the "burning steps" method? One which we don't recommend you use when writing a literature review, for sure. It is important to really understand what you are reading. You won't be able to decide which sources are ideal for your work if you browse their pages superficially. So make sure you start reading every book and article you need with a considerable advance. Once the deadline gets closer, it is not a secret that the pressure is higher. And the chances to overlook important information are higher too. You can estimate how much time you might need to complete your readings judging from the subject’s complexity. The more difficult the topic, the longer the time, obviously.

Literature review guidelines

literature review guidelines

Are you familiar with the "burning steps" method? One which we don't recommend you use when writing a literature review, for sure. It is important to really understand what you are reading. You won't be able to decide which sources are ideal for your work if you browse their pages superficially. So make sure you start reading every book and article you need with a considerable advance. Once the deadline gets closer, it is not a secret that the pressure is higher. And the chances to overlook important information are higher too. You can estimate how much time you might need to complete your readings judging from the subject’s complexity. The more difficult the topic, the longer the time, obviously.

Media:

literature review guidelinesliterature review guidelinesliterature review guidelinesliterature review guidelines